These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1756790)

  • 1. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.
    Jakobson LS; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 86(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 1756790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.
    Gentilucci M; Toni I; Chieffi S; Pavesi G
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 99(3):483-500. PubMed ID: 7957728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.
    Zoia S; Pezzetta E; Blason L; Scabar A; Carrozzi M; Bulgheroni M; Castiello U
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):719-38. PubMed ID: 16995833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prehension with trunk assisted reaching.
    Saling M; Stelmach GE; Mescheriakov S; Berger M
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Oct; 80(1-2):153-60. PubMed ID: 8905138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning an action.
    Gentilucci M; Negrotti A; Gangitano M
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jun; 115(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 9224839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 12783144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.
    Connolly JD; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Apr; 125(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 10229019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.
    Paulignan Y; Jeannerod M; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 87(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 1769391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.
    Desmurget M; Prablanc C; Arzi M; Rossetti Y; Paulignan Y; Urquizar C
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jul; 110(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 8836690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state.
    Schettino LF; Adamovich SV; Hening W; Tunik E; Sage J; Poizner H
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):186-202. PubMed ID: 16041510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture.
    Saling M; Mescheriakov S; Molokanova E; Stelmach GE; Berger M
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Mar; 108(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 8801129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.
    Nataraj R; Pasluosta C; Li ZM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Aug; 36():134-53. PubMed ID: 24968371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.
    Rand MK; Shimansky Y; Stelmach GE; Bloedel JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(1):50-65. PubMed ID: 14530893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension.
    Melmoth DR; Storoni M; Todd G; Finlay AL; Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 17665181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):349-71. PubMed ID: 16707178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinematic analysis of prehension movements in children.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Stolze H; Boczek-Funcke A; Jöhnk K; Heinrichs H; Illert M
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 93(1-2):131-41. PubMed ID: 9659995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.
    Gentilucci M; Castiello U; Corradini ML; Scarpa M; Umiltà C; Rizzolatti G
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(5):361-78. PubMed ID: 1886680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.