BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17569681)

  • 1. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.
    Manegold JC; Israel CW; Ehrlich JR; Duray G; Pajitnev D; Wegener FT; Hohnloser SH
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Jul; 28(14):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
    Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
    Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
    Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].
    Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
    Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Atrial defibrillator].
    Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Z Kardiol; 2000; 89 Suppl 3():206-14. PubMed ID: 10810804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].
    Carunchio A; Burattini M; Coletta C; Pandolfo L; Porzio A; Zecchini F; Ceci V
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jun; 3(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12116814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA).
    Kirchhof P; Mönnig G; Wasmer K; Heinecke A; Breithardt G; Eckardt L; Böcker D
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1292-7. PubMed ID: 15734772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
    Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
    Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Manoharan G; Evans N; Allen D; Anderson J; Adgey J
    Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(13):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15051642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S
    Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of biphasic electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on early recurrent atrial fibrillation and shock efficacy.
    Siaplaouras S; Buob A; Rötter C; Böhm M; Jung J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):895-7. PubMed ID: 15333081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Koster RW; Dorian P; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; O'Grady SG; Walker RG
    Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):e20. PubMed ID: 15131555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Predictors of efficacy initial low energy of external rectilinear biphasic cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation].
    Górecki AI; Stec S; Kucharska I; Wełnicki M; Zaborska B; Kryński T; Kułakowski P
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Dec; 23(138):408-12. PubMed ID: 18432122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of success and effect of biphasic energy on electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Alegret JM; Viñolas X; Sagristá J; Hernandez-Madrid A; Pérez L; Sabaté X; Mont L; Medina A;
    Europace; 2007 Oct; 9(10):942-6. PubMed ID: 17545688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of the multicenter RENEWAL 3 AVT clinical study of cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Saxon LA; Greenfield RA; Crandall BG; Nydegger CC; Orlov M; VAN Genderen R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 May; 17(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 16684026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Biphasic shock waveform for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency room].
    Antonelli D; Feldman A; Freedberg NA; Darawsha A; Rosenfeld T
    Harefuah; 2005 Jan; 144(1):4-7, 72. PubMed ID: 15719812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.
    Niebauer MJ; Brewer JE; Chung MK; Tchou PJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(12):1495-9. PubMed ID: 15194019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficacy and safety of ambulatory electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shock].
    Neri G; Alitto F; Zamprogno R; Biondi P; Stefanini MG; Pizzolato F; Buchberger R
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Dec; 2(12):1315-8. PubMed ID: 11838354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness and safety of internal rectilinear biphasic versus monophasic defibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Winterhalter M; Piepenbrock T; Leyh RG; Gras C; Zuk J; Heine J; Hagl C; Rahe-Meyer N; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2005 Dec; 19(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16326298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.