These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17570152)

  • 1. A robust and efficient algorithm for the shape description of protein structures and its application in predicting ligand binding sites.
    Xie L; Bourne PE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S9. PubMed ID: 17570152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons.
    Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Kahraman A; Thornton JM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2347-55. PubMed ID: 15728116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving homology models for protein-ligand binding sites.
    Kauffman C; Rangwala H; Karypis G
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2008; 7():211-22. PubMed ID: 19642282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ADP_EM: fast exhaustive multi-resolution docking for high-throughput coverage.
    Garzón JI; Kovacs J; Abagyan R; Chacón P
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17150992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple shape characteristic of protein-protein recognition.
    Nicola G; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):789-92. PubMed ID: 17267427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient recognition of folds in protein 3D structures by the improved PRIDE algorithm.
    Gáspári Z; Vlahovicek K; Pongor S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3322-3. PubMed ID: 15914542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures.
    Friedberg I; Harder T; Kolodny R; Sitbon E; Li Z; Godzik A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e219-24. PubMed ID: 17237095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century.
    Aloy P; Pichaud M; Russell RB
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15718128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective labeling of molecular surface points for cavity detection and location of putative binding sites.
    Bock ME; Garutti C; Guerra C
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():263-74. PubMed ID: 17951830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient shape descriptors for feature extraction in 3D protein structures.
    Ranganath A; Shet KC; Vidyavathi N
    In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 17688442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarity Search of Flexible 3D Molecules Combining Local and Global Shape Descriptors.
    Axenopoulos A; Rafailidis D; Papadopoulos G; Houstis EN; Daras P
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(5):954-970. PubMed ID: 26561479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria.
    Peters KP; Fauck J; Frömmel C
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SHARP2: protein-protein interaction predictions using patch analysis.
    Murakami Y; Jones S
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1794-5. PubMed ID: 16672257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment.
    Zhou HX; Qin S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2203-9. PubMed ID: 17586545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraction, quantification and visualization of protein pockets.
    Zhang X; Bajaj C
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():275-86. PubMed ID: 17951831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DynaPred: a structure and sequence based method for the prediction of MHC class I binding peptide sequences and conformations.
    Antes I; Siu SW; Lengauer T
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e16-24. PubMed ID: 16873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.