These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Endothelial damage by the corneal Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Legeais JM; Parel JM; Simon G; Ren Q; Denham D Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 8398970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of three methods for trephining donor corneal buttons: endothelial cell loss and microscopic ultrastructural evaluation. Moshirfar M; Meyer JJ; Kang PC Curr Eye Res; 2009 Nov; 34(11):939-44. PubMed ID: 19958110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hanna suction punch block and trephine system for penetrating keratoplasty. Waring GO; Hanna KD Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Oct; 107(10):1536-9. PubMed ID: 2803106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty with different trephine systems -- a clinical investigation from the university eye hospital of halle/saale and the eye clinic of the helios hospital aue]. Jähne UG; Duncker GI; Jähne MG Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Dec; 221(12):1012-9. PubMed ID: 15599807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of the cutting procedure on the loss of corneal endothelial cells of the recipient eye in mechanically guided trephination. Daniel J; Huebscher HJ Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 Dec; 232(12):753-8. PubMed ID: 7890190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manual suction versus femtosecond laser trephination for penetrating keratoplasty: intraocular pressure, endothelial cell damage, incision geometry, and wound healing responses. Angunawela RI; Riau A; Chaurasia SS; Tan DT; Mehta JS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):2571-9. PubMed ID: 22427557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preparation of donor lamellar tissue for deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty using a microkeratome and artificial anterior chamber system: endothelial cell loss and predictability of lamellar thickness. Kang PC; McEntire MW; Thompson CJ; Moshirfar M Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 16238036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of tissue damage produced by repeated use of a corneal trephine: a scanning electron microscopic study. Jaais F; Dutton GN Ophthalmic Surg; 1992 Mar; 23(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 1574293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Technical problems in microsurgical processing of preserved donor tissue]. Draeger J; Kohlhaas M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 200(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 1578870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new scleral suction trephine for retrieval of corneoscleral donor tissue. Vrabec MP; Fan NI; Dahl P; Florakis GJ J Refract Surg; 1996 Feb; 12(2):S302-3. PubMed ID: 8653518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Impact of intracameral pressure on donor cut angles in nonmechanical Er:YAG laser trephination for penetrating keratoplasty]. Sauer R; Seitz B; Mardin C; Langenbucher A; Hofmann-Rummelt C; Viestenz A; Küchle M; Naumann GO Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Jun; 220(6):396-403. PubMed ID: 12830393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Top-hat shaped corneal trephination for penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser: a histomorphological study. Kook D; Derhartunian V; Bug R; Kohnen T Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):795-800. PubMed ID: 19574905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]