These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17570792)

  • 1. Cost analysis of minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric setting.
    Mahomed AA; McLean V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Jun; 17(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 17570792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children.
    Luks FI; Logan J; Breuer CK; Kurkchubasche AG; Wesselhoeft CW; Tracy TF
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1999 Sep; 153(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 10482214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of unilateral nonpalpable testicles.
    Lorenzo AJ; Samuelson ML; Docimo SG; Baker LA; Lotan Y
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):712-6. PubMed ID: 15247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures.
    Roumm AR; Pizzi L; Goldfarb NI; Cohn H
    Surg Innov; 2005 Sep; 12(3):261-87. PubMed ID: 16224649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for the treatment of different urologic pathologies in pediatrics: single-center single-surgeon experience.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Elmissery M; Elsalmy S; Moussa A; Aboelfotoh A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Feb; 11(1):33.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25459388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost containment in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: feasibility and advantages over open radical nephrectomy.
    Guazzoni G; Cestari A; Naspro R; Riva M; Rigatti P
    J Endourol; 2006 Jul; 20(7):509-13. PubMed ID: 16859466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care.
    Guzman MJ; Gitelis ME; Linn JG; Ujiki MB; Waskerwitz M; Umanskiy K; Muldoon JP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 26445185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost containment: an experience with surgeon education and universal preference cards at two institutions.
    Embick E; Bieri M; Koehler TJ; Yang A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5148-5152. PubMed ID: 31844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization and costs associated with robotic surgery in children.
    Mahida JB; Cooper JN; Herz D; Diefenbach KA; Deans KJ; Minneci PC; McLeod DJ
    J Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 199(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 26013442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardization of operative equipment reduces cost.
    Avansino JR; Goldin AB; Risley R; Waldhausen JH; Sawin RS
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Sep; 48(9):1843-9. PubMed ID: 24074655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Pursuit of the Most Cost-Effective Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy: The Effect of Disposable Instrument Choice on Operative Time and Surgeon-Controllable Cost.
    Abbott EE; Chan JC; Boura J; Novotny NM
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1309-1313. PubMed ID: 29068764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Straface S
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology.
    Fahlenkamp D; Winfield HN; Schönberger B; Mueller W; Loening SA
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 9266236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.