155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17570833)
1. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast calcifications with percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy diagnosis of malignancy or atypical hyerplasia: correlations with surgical findings].
Piubello Q; Montemezzi S; D'Atri C
Pathologica; 2002 Dec; 94(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 12540993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.
Tonegutti M; Girardi V
Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18338128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results, follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion.
Zuiani C; Mazzarella F; Londero V; Linda A; Puglisi F; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):304-17. PubMed ID: 17361368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The stereotaxic core breast biopsy using the Mammotome: an alternative to intraoperative examination].
Giardina C; Guerrieri AM; Ingravallo G; Serio G; Mastropasqua MG; Lomele M; Lattanzio V
Pathologica; 2002 Aug; 94(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 12325416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The management of lobular neoplasia identified on percutaneous core breast biopsy.
Bauer VP; Ditkoff BA; Schnabel F; Brenin D; El-Tamer M; Smith S
Breast J; 2003; 9(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 12558663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Core biopsy of breast lesions.
Smyth AT; Cederbom GJ
J La State Med Soc; 1994 Nov; 146(11):499-501. PubMed ID: 7806950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Core Wash Cytology: A reliable same day biopsy result for breast clinics.
Bulte JP; Wauters CA; Duijm LE; de Wilt JH; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1821-1826. PubMed ID: 27450639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes of stereotactic breast biopsies.
Makoske T; Preletz R; Riley L; Fogarty K; Swank M; Cochrane P; Blisard D
Am Surg; 2000 Dec; 66(12):1104-8; discussion 1108-9. PubMed ID: 11149580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy.
Liberman L
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):791-807. PubMed ID: 10943278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center.
Farshid G; Edwards S; Kollias J; Gill PG
Mod Pathol; 2018 Mar; 31(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 29099502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal invasive biopsy results of "uncertain malignant potential" in digital mammography screening: high prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy.
Weigel S; Decker T; Korsching E; Biesheuvel C; Wöstmann A; Böcker W; Hungermann D; Roterberg K; Tio J; Heindel W
Rofo; 2011 Aug; 183(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21506072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
