These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17570925)

  • 1. Accounting for relatedness in family based genetic association studies.
    McArdle PF; O'Connell JR; Pollin TI; Baumgarten M; Shuldiner AR; Peyser PA; Mitchell BD
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 17570925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the impact of relatedness on SNP association analysis.
    Gross A; Tönjes A; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2017 Dec; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 29212447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating power and type 1 error in large pedigree analyses of binary traits.
    Cummings AC; Torstenson E; Davis MF; D'Aoust LN; Scott WK; Pericak-Vance MA; Bush WS; Haines JL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62615. PubMed ID: 23658753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait loci.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Nov; 63(Pt 6):545-63. PubMed ID: 11246457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of pedigree structure on heritability estimates.
    Ekstrøm CT
    Hum Hered; 2009; 68(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 19622891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and power of association testing in family-based sampling designs: evidence for and against the common wisdom.
    Knight S; Camp NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 21328615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phenotypic covariance across the entire spectrum of relatedness for 86 billion pairs of individuals.
    Kemper KE; Yengo L; Zheng Z; Abdellaoui A; Keller MC; Goddard ME; Wray NR; Yang J; Visscher PM
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):1050. PubMed ID: 33594080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust asymptotic sampling theory for correlations in pedigrees.
    Keen KJ; Elston RC
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(20):3229-47. PubMed ID: 14518025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of multilocus inheritance for gene-disease association studies.
    Risch N
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 11855955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical considerations regarding the use of genotype and pedigree data to model relatedness in the context of genome-wide association studies.
    Cheng R; Parker CC; Abney M; Palmer AA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Oct; 3(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 23979941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the wild.
    Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2593-9. PubMed ID: 15969737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating heritability from nuclear family and pedigree data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():171-86. PubMed ID: 22307699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power comparison of regression methods to test quantitative traits for association and linkage.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 10797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Possibility of the current segregation analysis to discriminate between monogenic and multifactorial types of inheritance of traits. The effect of the structure of family data on model robustness and power of the analysis].
    Koroleva AG; Ageev SV
    Genetika; 1988 Oct; 24(10):1889-93. PubMed ID: 3234747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of genotyping error in linkage mapping for complex traits--an analytic study.
    Lebrec JJ; Putter H; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; van Houwelingen HC
    BMC Genet; 2008 Aug; 9():57. PubMed ID: 18721489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple and robust TDT-type test against genotyping error with error rates varying across families.
    Cheng KF; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17476111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for cryptic relatedness in population-based association studies of continuous traits.
    Zhang F; Deng HW
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19797906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type I error rates in association versus joint linkage/association tests in related individuals.
    Kent JW; Dyer TD; Göring HH; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17219375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.