BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17570999)

  • 21. Long-term reproducibility of screening for glaucoma with FDT-perimetry.
    Horn FK; Link B; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Martus P
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 17700287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Correlation between confocal tomography of the optic nerve (HRT) and the perimetric frequency doubling technology].
    Sampaolesi R; Brusini P; Sampaolesi JR
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Nov; 220(11):754-66. PubMed ID: 14634902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
    Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements.
    Mardin CY; Peters A; Horn F; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 16865006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma.
    van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography.
    Bayer AU; Maag KP; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jul; 109(7):1350-61. PubMed ID: 12093662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community.
    Cioffi GA; Mansberger S; Spry P; Johnson C; Van Buskirk EM
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000; 98():195-9; discussion 199-202. PubMed ID: 11190023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects and visual field abnormalities by humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Lee MJ; Kim DM; Jeoung JW; Hwang SS; Kim TW; Park KH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 143(6):1056-8. PubMed ID: 17524781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
    Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
    Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
    Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.