136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17571568)
1. [Study regarding coronal fracture probability in posterior amalgam restorations].
Andrian S; Iovan G; Oncea C; Teodorovici P; Hasna M
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 17571568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
el-Mowafy OM
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study.
Nagasiri R; Chitmongkolsuk S
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15674228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.
Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; D'Hoore W; Carvalho J; Qvist V
J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):395-405. PubMed ID: 12878022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
Lyons K;
N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
Janus C; Sbeih I; Best AM
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single appointment amalgam crown procedure for posterior teeth.
Udrys GR; Meyer RD
Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 10687471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
el-Badrawy WA
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique.
Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
