220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17572039)
1. Electron donors for biological sulfate reduction.
Liamleam W; Annachhatre AP
Biotechnol Adv; 2007; 25(5):452-63. PubMed ID: 17572039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treating industrial discharges by thermophilic sulfate reduction process with molasses as electron donor.
Liamleam W; Annachhatre AP
Environ Technol; 2007 Jun; 28(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 17624104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage.
Sánchez-Andrea I; Sanz JL; Bijmans MF; Stams AJ
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Mar; 269():98-109. PubMed ID: 24444599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Column experiments to assess the effects of electron donors on the efficiency of in situ precipitation of Zn, Cd, Co and Ni in contaminated groundwater applying the biological sulfate removal technology.
Geets J; Vanbroekhoven K; Borremans B; Vangronsveld J; Diels L; van der Lelie D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Oct; 13(6):362-78. PubMed ID: 17120826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biochemistry, physiology and biotechnology of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Barton LL; Fauque GD
Adv Appl Microbiol; 2009; 68():41-98. PubMed ID: 19426853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of hydraulic retention time and sulfide toxicity on ethanol and acetate oxidation in sulfate-reducing metal-precipitating fluidized-bed reactor.
Kaksonen AH; Franzmann PD; Puhakka JA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 May; 86(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 15083513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethanol utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study.
Nagpal S; Chuichulcherm S; Livingston A; Peeva L
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Dec; 70(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 11042550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemical characterisation of organic electron donors for sulfate reduction for potential use in acid mine drainage treatment.
Coetser SE; Pulles W; Heath RG; Cloete TE
Biodegradation; 2006 Mar; 17(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 16447029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological conversion of anglesite (PbSO(4)) and lead waste from spent car batteries to galena (PbS).
Weijma J; De Hoop K; Bosma W; Dijkman H
Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 12153311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Silage supports sulfate reduction in the treatment of metals- and sulfate-containing waste waters.
Wakeman KD; Erving L; Riekkola-Vanhanen ML; Puhakka JA
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4932-9. PubMed ID: 20708212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancement of metal bioleaching from contaminated sediment using silver ion.
Chen SY; Lin JG
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(2-3):893-9. PubMed ID: 18514400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation.
Velasco A; Ramírez M; Volke-Sepúlveda T; González-Sánchez A; Revah S
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):407-13. PubMed ID: 17640800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sulfate reduction at pH 4.0 for treatment of process and wastewaters.
Bijmans MF; de Vries E; Yang CH; N Buisman CJ; Lens PN; Dopson M
Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(4):1029-37. PubMed ID: 20306533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of sulfidogenic up-flow and down-flow fluidized-bed reactors for the biotreatment of acidic metal-containing wastewater.
Sahinkaya E; Gungor M
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(24):9508-14. PubMed ID: 20724148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lead removal and toxicity reduction from industrial wastewater through biological sulfate reduction process.
Teekayuttasakul P; Annachhatre AP
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2008 Oct; 43(12):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18780220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of bacteria involved in the biological sulfur cycle for paper mill effluent purification.
Janssen AJ; Lens PN; Stams AJ; Plugge CM; Sorokin DY; Muyzer G; Dijkman H; Van Zessen E; Luimes P; Buisman CJ
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(4):1333-43. PubMed ID: 19027933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sulfide oxidation under chemolithoautotrophic denitrifying conditions.
Cardoso RB; Sierra-Alvarez R; Rowlette P; Flores ER; Gómez J; Field JA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Dec; 95(6):1148-57. PubMed ID: 16807929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biotreatment of zinc-containing wastewater in a sulfidogenic CSTR: Performance and artificial neural network (ANN) modelling studies.
Sahinkaya E
J Hazard Mater; 2009 May; 164(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 18774640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective recovery of nickel over iron from a nickel-iron solution using microbial sulfate reduction in a gas-lift bioreactor.
Bijmans MF; van Helvoort PJ; Dar SA; Dopson M; Lens PN; Buisman CJ
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 19059621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage.
Logan MV; Reardon KF; Figueroa LA; McLain JE; Ahmann DM
Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4537-51. PubMed ID: 16213004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
