518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17572197)
1. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does prior benign prostate biopsy predict outcome for patients treated with radical perineal prostatectomy?
Raj GV; Brashears JH; Anand A; Paulson DF; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):332-6. PubMed ID: 15708048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening with low PSA cutoff values results in low rates of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Berger AP; Volgger H; Rogatsch H; Strohmeyer D; Steiner H; Klocker H; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Prostate; 2002 Nov; 53(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 12386925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Wieder JA; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Weldon VE; Tavel FR; Neuwirth H; Cohen R
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1565-9. PubMed ID: 7536268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Peroperative biopsy of the sub-apical urethra during prostatectomy for cancer].
Ponthieu A; Delgrande J; Ivaldi A
Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):250-5; discussion 255-6. PubMed ID: 8777418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact?
Connolly SS; O'Toole GC; O'Malley KJ; Manecksha R; O'Brien A; Mulvin DW; Quinlan DM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15204423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy: hypogonadism represents bad prognosis in prostate cancer.
Teloken C; Da Ros CT; Caraver F; Weber FA; Cavalheiro AP; Graziottin TM
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2178-80. PubMed ID: 16280759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isolated seminal vesicle invasion imparts better outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prognostic stratification of pt3b disease by nodal and margin status.
Masterson TA; Pettus JA; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 15992904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathological outcome in 167 patients operated on with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Solberg A; Viset T; Haugen OA; Mjønes J; Klepp O; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 16159748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The usefulness of touch preparation cytological evaluation and prostatic capsule involvement in prediction of prostate cancer recurrence.
Brannigan RE; Shin E; Rademaker A; Oyasu R; Huang CF; Pearle MS; McVary KT
J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1741-7. PubMed ID: 9783944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of recurrent PSA after radical prostatectomy: benign versus malignant sources.
Ravery V
Semin Urol Oncol; 1999 Aug; 17(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 10462314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
