BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1757278)

  • 1. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
    Grossman MB; Clofine R
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
    Broso P; Buffetti G; Sacco A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the effect of the sampling sequence.
    Noel ML; Kazal LA; Glenday MC
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993; 6(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 8452061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved yield of endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears in a residency setting.
    Kivlahan C; Ingram E
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Apr; 20(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 3981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
    Ferris DG; Berrey MM; Ellis KE; Petry LJ; Voxnaes J; Beatie RT
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens.
    Dotters DJ; Carney CN; Droegemueller W
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 3177528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
    Shen JT; Nalick RH; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
    Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
    Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.