163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1757278)
21. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Effectiveness of a cervical brush in obtaining an endocervical samples as compared to a tongue holder].
Montes Sanchez G; Sierra López L; Mejía Mejía J; Carmona González E
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Jul; 65():305-9. PubMed ID: 9312520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving the yield of endocervical elements in a Pap smear with the use of the cytology brush.
Ruffin MT; Van Noord GR
Fam Med; 1991 Jul; 23(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 1884932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting.
Reissman SE
J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of Papanicolaou smears. Art or science?
Lee D; Patrissi GA; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1988 Oct; 33(10):795-8. PubMed ID: 3057205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ
Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The extended tip spatula for cervical cytology.
Colón VF; Linz LE
J Fam Pract; 1981 Jul; 13(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 7252437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pap smear adequacy: the role of clinician experience.
Kane BR; Berger MS; Lisney M
Fam Med; 1997 May; 29(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 9165281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
