These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1757286)

  • 1. Binaural amplitude discrimination and the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB
    Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 55(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 1757286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention.
    Oberfeld D; Stahn P; Kuta M
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 23010335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.
    Clinard CG; Hodgson SL; Scherer ME
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):355-369. PubMed ID: 27896486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amplitude discrimination in masking release paradigms.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 7642823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery from prior stimulation. II: Effects upon intensity discrimination.
    Zeng FG; Turner CW; Relkin EM
    Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 55(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 1757290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N; von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of binaural masking level difference in the inferior colliculus of the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Asadollahi A; Endler F; Nelken I; Wagner H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 32(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 20618828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions.
    Olsen WO; Noffsinger D; Kurdziel S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(5-6):375-82. PubMed ID: 1202912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments.
    Koehnke J; Colburn HS; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1558-62. PubMed ID: 3711455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging impairs the ability to ignore irrelevant information in frequency discrimination tasks.
    Espinoza-Varas B; Jang H
    Exp Aging Res; 2006; 32(2):209-26. PubMed ID: 16531361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural processing of filtered transients.
    Yost WA; Silva D
    Sens Processes; 1977 Aug; 1(4):363-75. PubMed ID: 918682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subcomponent cues in binaural unmasking.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3846-55. PubMed ID: 21682408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():42-53. PubMed ID: 28927640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability of tonal signals with changing interaural phase differences in noise.
    Grantham DW; Luethke LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1117-23. PubMed ID: 3356816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.