BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17573027)

  • 1. Change detection evokes a Simon-like effect.
    Galfano G; Mazza V; Tamè L; Umiltà C; Turatto M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17573027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
    Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
    Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus.
    Treccani B; Umiltà C; Tagliabue M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):268-86. PubMed ID: 16634670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.
    Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Object memory and change detection: dissociation as a function of visual and conceptual similarity.
    Yeh YY; Yang CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 17466252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.