These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17573297)

  • 1. The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment.
    Limerick MH
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2007 Mar; 34(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 17573297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metasynthesis: withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: the experience of family decision-makers.
    Meeker MA; Jezewski MA
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jan; 18(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 19120746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.
    Esteban A; Gordo F; Solsona JF; Alía I; Caballero J; Bouza C; Alcalá-Zamora J; Cook DJ; Sanchez JM; Abizanda R; Miró G; Fernández Del Cabo MJ; de Miguel E; Santos JA; Balerdi B
    Intensive Care Med; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1744-9. PubMed ID: 11810117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Family members' experiences with decision making for incompetent patients in the ICU: a qualitative study.
    Jacob DA
    Am J Crit Care; 1998 Jan; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9429681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The surrogate's experience during treatment decision-making.
    Jeffers BR
    Medsurg Nurs; 1998 Dec; 7(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 10036440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
    Cook DJ; Giacomini M; Johnson N; Willms D
    CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(9):1109-13. PubMed ID: 10569086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit.
    Stapleton RD; Engelberg RA; Wenrich MD; Goss CH; Curtis JR
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Jun; 34(6):1679-85. PubMed ID: 16625131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: an 8-yr retrospective review in a Spanish pediatric intensive care unit.
    Launes C; Cambra FJ; Jordán I; Palomeque A
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 12(6):e383-5. PubMed ID: 21263365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The practice of and documentation on withholding and withdrawing life support: a retrospective study in two Dutch intensive care units.
    Spronk PE; Kuiper AV; Rommes JH; Korevaar JC; Schultz MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 19690256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study of primary surrogate decision makers' knowledge of intensive care.
    Rodriguez RM; Navarrete E; Schwaber J; McKleroy W; Clouse A; Kerrigan SF; Fortman J
    Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 36(5):1633-6. PubMed ID: 18434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Decision-making regarding life-sustaining medical treatment in a pediatric intensive-care unit].
    Haasnoot M; van Leeuwen E; Plötz FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(37):2029-31. PubMed ID: 16184941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of completing a surrogacy information and decision-making tool upon admission to an intensive care unit on length of stay and charges.
    Hatler CW; Grove C; Strickland S; Barron S; White BD
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 22822700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pilot audit of the process of end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit.
    Zib M; Saul P
    Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Jun; 9(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 17536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [No conspicuous changes in the practice of medical end-of-life decision-making for neonates and infants in the Netherlands in 2001 as compared to 1995].
    Vrakking AM; van der Heide A; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; Keij-Deerenberg IM; van der Maas PJ; van der Wal G
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Sep; 149(37):2047-51. PubMed ID: 16184946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the Irish Ethicus data.
    Collins N; Phelan D; Marsh B; Sprung CL
    Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 17227268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate decision making for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
    Long B; Clark L; Cook P
    J Trauma Nurs; 2011; 18(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 22157528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The surrogate's experience in authorizing a do not resuscitate order.
    Handy CM; Sulmasy DP; Merkel CK; Ury WA
    Palliat Support Care; 2008 Mar; 6(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 18282340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.
    Weber S
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2007 Dec; 19(12):652-67. PubMed ID: 18042131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forgoing life-sustaining treatments: comparison of attitudes between Israeli and North American intensive care healthcare professionals.
    Soudry E; Sprung CL; Levin PD; Grunfeld GB; Einav S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Nov; 5(11):770-4. PubMed ID: 14650099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.