These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17573368)

  • 1. Influence of the rotation centre in panoramic radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Buchgeister M; Reinert S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17573368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Estimating organ doses of dental students in dental radiographic exercises].
    Takano H; Nishi T; Kawase C; Kaneko M
    Higashi Nihon Shigaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 9(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2131293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of some factors affecting image quality in panoramic radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Axmann-Krcmar D; Reuter I; Meyle J; Gómez-Román G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10808220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dosimetry in dental radiology: comparison of spiral computerized tomography and orthopantomography].
    Villari N; Stecco A; Zatelli G
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):378-81. PubMed ID: 10432970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Downes SL; Mokhtari M; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Akbari F; Bayani Roodi S
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 23456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC; Schneeberger P; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 11402291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbed doses modified by exposure settings with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 8620589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.