These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17573388)
41. Mechanical airway obstruction after cricoid pressure with the laryngeal mask airway. Brimacombe JR; Berry A Anesth Analg; 1994 Mar; 78(3):604-5. PubMed ID: 8109789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure. Bercker S; Schmidbauer W; Volk T; Bogusch G; Bubser HP; Hensel M; Kerner T Anesth Analg; 2008 Feb; 106(2):445-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18227299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Videographic analysis of glottic view with increasing cricoid pressure force. Oh J; Lim T; Chee Y; Kang H; Cho Y; Lee J; Kim D; Jeong M Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 23306455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals. Cavus E; Deitmer W; Francksen H; Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Doerges V Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intubation through the laryngeal mask. A technique for unexpected difficult intubation. Heath ML; Allagain J Anaesthesia; 1991 Jul; 46(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 1862892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Efficacy of the laryngeal tube during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Asai T; Murao K; Shingu K Anaesthesia; 2000 Nov; 55(11):1099-102. PubMed ID: 11069337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of cricoid pressure on laryngeal view during prehospital tracheal intubation: a propensity-based analysis. Caruana E; Chevret S; Pirracchio R Emerg Med J; 2017 Mar; 34(3):132-137. PubMed ID: 27694275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children. Kim JT; Na HS; Bae JY; Kim HJ; Shin HY; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim SD Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures. Zand F; Amini A; Sadeghi SE; Gureishi M; Chohedri A Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube placement during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck. Komatsu R; Nagata O; Kamata K; Yamagata K; Sessler DI; Ozaki M Anaesthesia; 2005 Feb; 60(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 15644005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of cricoid pressure on intubation facilitated by the gum elastic bougie. McNelis U; Syndercombe A; Harper I; Duggan J Anaesthesia; 2007 May; 62(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 17448056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cricoid pressure: apply - but be ready to release. Turnbull J; Patel A; Athanassoglou V; Pandit JJ Anaesthesia; 2016 Sep; 71(9):999-1003. PubMed ID: 27523049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Comparison of the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Proseal laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized patients]. Ueno M; Suzuki A; Takahata O; Iwasaki H Masui; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18807900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison between Laryngeal Tube Suction II Airway and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in laparascopic surgery. Esa K; Azarinah I; Muhammad M; Helmi MA; Jaafar MZ Med J Malaysia; 2011 Aug; 66(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 22111436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in the Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia: The IRIS Randomized Clinical Trial. Birenbaum A; Hajage D; Roche S; Ntouba A; Eurin M; Cuvillon P; Rohn A; Compere V; Benhamou D; Biais M; Menut R; Benachi S; Lenfant F; Riou B; JAMA Surg; 2019 Jan; 154(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 30347104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A pilot randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of cricoid pressure on risk of aspiration. Bohman JK; Kashyap R; Lee A; He Z; Soundar S; Bolling LL; Kor DJ Clin Respir J; 2018 Jan; 12(1):175-182. PubMed ID: 27273863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]