324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17573762)
1. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cytology laboratories.
Wiener HG; Klinkhamer P; Schenck U; Arbyn M; Bulten J; Bergeron C; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2007 Apr; 18(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 17397490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.
Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath liquid-based cytology system.
Narine N; Young W
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 17578516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.
Steiner C
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cytology specimen adequacy: patient management guidelines and optimizing specimen collection.
Davey DD; Cox JT; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Colgan TJ; Howell LP; Husain M; Darragh TM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(2):71-81. PubMed ID: 18369299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1.
Jordan J; Arbyn M; Martin-Hirsch P; Schenck U; Baldauf JJ; Da Silva D; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Prendiville W
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASCCP patient management guidelines: Pap test specimen adequacy and quality indicators.
Davey DD; Austin RM; Birdsong G; Buck HW; Cox JT; Darragh TM; Elgert PA; Hanson V; Henry MR; Waldman J;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 12428791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical histopathology.
Bulten J; Horvat R; Jordan J; Herbert A; Wiener H; Arbyn M
Acta Oncol; 2011 Jun; 50(5):611-20. PubMed ID: 21314297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adequacy of cellular material in split-sampling of cervical scrapings for routine cancer screening: an analysis of 702 smears.
Othman N; Othman NH
Malays J Pathol; 2012 Dec; 34(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 23424773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
