157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17574368)
1. A prospective comparison study for predicting circumferential resection margin between preoperative MRI and whole mount sections in mid-rectal cancer: significance of different scan planes.
Kim YW; Kim NK; Min BS; Kim H; Pyo J; Kim MJ; Cha SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 17574368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of MRI for predicting the circumferential resection margin, mesorectal fascia invasion, and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Park HS; Eun HW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1093-101. PubMed ID: 19388124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor.
Peschaud F; Cuenod CA; Benoist S; Julié C; Beauchet A; Siauve N; Taieb-Kasbi F; Penna C; Nordlinger B
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Aug; 48(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 15937629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status.
Kulkarni T; Gollins S; Maw A; Hobson P; Byrne R; Widdowson D
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-89. PubMed ID: 18318754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
Brown G; Radcliffe AG; Newcombe RG; Dallimore NS; Bourne MW; Williams GT
Br J Surg; 2003 Mar; 90(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 12594673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.
Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin - a root cause analysis.
Youssef H; Collantes EC; Rashid SH; Wong LS; Baragwanath P
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jun; 11(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 18637930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local staging of rectal carcinoma and assessment of the circumferential resection margin with high-resolution MRI using an integrated parallel acquisition technique.
Oberholzer K; Junginger T; Kreitner KF; Krummenauer F; Simiantonaki N; Trouet S; Thelen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 15971183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-Tesla rectal magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee MW; Kim GH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):587-93. PubMed ID: 18648259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.
Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma?
Khani MH; Smedh K; Kraaz W
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 17535279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One millimetre is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer.
Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran B; Blomqvist L; Swift I; St Rose S; Sebag-Montefiore DJ; Tekkis P; Brown G;
Br J Surg; 2011 Jun; 98(6):872-9. PubMed ID: 21480194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Tilney HS; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 17504336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery.
Hermanek P; Junginger T
Tech Coloproctol; 2005 Dec; 9(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 16328130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
