These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17574406)

  • 21. Sustainable construction: construction and demolition waste reconsidered.
    del Río Merino M; Izquierdo Gracia P; Weis Azevedo IS
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 19723824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survey of food-related waste management practises in New Brunswick health establishments.
    Robichaud R; Cormier A; Gaudet-Leblanc C
    J Can Diet Assoc; 1995; 56(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10141088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Challenges in sustainable management of construction and demolition waste.
    Agamuthu P
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Dec; 26(6):491-2. PubMed ID: 19039063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Building waste management in Bulgaria: challenges and opportunities.
    Hadjieva-Zaharieva R; Dimitrova E; Buyle-Bodin F
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(8):749-61. PubMed ID: 14522194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of unit-based pricing of waste in the Netherlands: applying a general equilibrium model.
    van Beukering PJ; Bartelings H; Linderhof VG; Oosterhuis FH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Nov; 29(11):2892-901. PubMed ID: 19679460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extended theory of planned behaviour for promoting construction waste recycling in Hong Kong.
    Mak TMW; Yu IKM; Wang L; Hsu SC; Tsang DCW; Li CN; Yeung TLY; Zhang R; Poon CS
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jan; 83():161-170. PubMed ID: 30514463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management.
    Yuan H; Shen L
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):670-9. PubMed ID: 21169008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-cultural comparison of concrete recycling decision-making and implementation in construction industry.
    Tam VW; Tam L; Le KN
    Waste Manag; 2010 Feb; 30(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 19854634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measuring bulky waste arisings in Hong Kong.
    Chung SS; Lau KY; Zhang C
    Waste Manag; 2010 May; 30(5):737-43. PubMed ID: 20100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using plastic bag waste to assess the reliability of self-reported waste disposal data.
    Chung SS
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2574-84. PubMed ID: 18304795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facilitating the improved management of waste in South Africa through a national waste information system.
    Godfrey L
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1660-71. PubMed ID: 17681746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste.
    Yuan H; Chini AR; Lu Y; Shen L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Mar; 32(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 22197665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The S-curve for forecasting waste generation in construction projects.
    Lu W; Peng Y; Chen X; Skitmore M; Zhang X
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():23-34. PubMed ID: 27485070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Municipal solid waste management in Tehran: current practices, opportunities and challenges.
    Damghani AM; Savarypour G; Zand E; Deihimfard R
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(5):929-34. PubMed ID: 17881212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating construction and demolition debris generation using a materials flow analysis approach.
    Cochran KM; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2247-54. PubMed ID: 20472418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis.
    Hsu PF; Wu CR; Li YT
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(8):1386-94. PubMed ID: 17689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of slope stability in two Brazilian municipal landfills.
    Gharabaghi B; Singh MK; Inkratas C; Fleming IR; McBean E
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1509-17. PubMed ID: 17897819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Searching quality data for municipal solid waste planning.
    Chowdhury M
    Waste Manag; 2009 Aug; 29(8):2240-7. PubMed ID: 19410445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The collection system for residential recyclables in communities in Haidian District, Beijing: a possible approach for China recycling.
    Wang J; Han L; Li S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1672-80. PubMed ID: 17967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Networking possibilities for waste recycling in Miyagi prefecture, Japan.
    Omura M; Qin CY; Ohtani H; Iwasaki R; Shigeno Y; Yu JS; Nakazawa S
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(5):711-9. PubMed ID: 16987646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.