219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17574487)
21. Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Kierkels RG; Visser R; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA; van 't Veld AA; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():87. PubMed ID: 25885444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Swallowing sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (SW-IMRT) in head and neck cancer: Clinical validation according to the model-based approach.
Christianen ME; van der Schaaf A; van der Laan HP; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Doornaert P; Chouvalova O; Steenbakkers RJ; Leemans CR; Oosting SF; van der Laan BF; Roodenburg JL; Slotman BJ; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Feb; 118(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 26700602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Image Guidance-Based Target Volume Margin Expansion in IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 15(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 25432930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.
Hansen EK; Bucci MK; Quivey JM; Weinberg V; Xia P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Feb; 64(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 16256277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hypoxia-targeted radiotherapy dose painting for head and neck cancer using (18)F-FMISO PET: a biological modeling study.
Chang JH; Wada M; Anderson NJ; Lim Joon D; Lee ST; Gong SJ; Gunawardana DH; Sachinidis J; O'Keefe G; Gan HK; Khoo V; Scott AM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Nov; 52(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 23317145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multivariable normal tissue complication probability model-based treatment plan optimization for grade 2-4 dysphagia and tube feeding dependence in head and neck radiotherapy.
Kierkels RGJ; Wopken K; Visser R; Korevaar EW; van der Schaaf A; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Dec; 121(3):374-380. PubMed ID: 27614681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deep learning-based metal artifact reduction using cycle-consistent adversarial network for intensity-modulated head and neck radiation therapy treatment planning.
Koike Y; Anetai Y; Takegawa H; Ohira S; Nakamura S; Tanigawa N
Phys Med; 2020 Oct; 78():8-14. PubMed ID: 32911374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of target volume segmentation accuracy and variability on treatment planning for 4D-CT-based non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy.
Martin S; Johnson C; Brophy M; Palma DA; Barron JL; Beauchemin SS; Louie AV; Yu E; Yaremko B; Ahmad B; Rodrigues GB; Gaede S
Acta Oncol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):322-32. PubMed ID: 25350526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without elective nodal irradiation in locally advanced NSCLC: A direct comparison of PET-based treatment planning.
Fleckenstein J; Kremp K; Kremp S; Palm J; Rübe C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Feb; 192(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 26438071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Boughalia A; Marcie S; Fellah M; Chami S; Mekki F
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140839. PubMed ID: 25882689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: challenges and solution.
Mail N; Albarakati Y; Ahmad Khan M; Saeedi F; Safadi N; Al-Ghamdi S; Saoudi A
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081714. PubMed ID: 23927311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Target volume definition for head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy: pre-clinical evaluation of PARSPORT trial guidelines.
Guerrero Urbano MT; Clark CH; Kong C; Miles E; Dearnaley DP; Harrington KJ; Nutting CM; PARSPORT Trial Management Group
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Oct; 19(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 17706404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning.
Miki K; Mori S; Hasegawa A; Naganawa K; Koto M
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150988. PubMed ID: 26942839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.
Giantsoudi D; De Man B; Verburg J; Trofimov A; Jin Y; Wang G; Gjesteby L; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(8):R49-R80. PubMed ID: 28323641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. NTCP modeling analysis of acute hematologic toxicity in whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies - A dosimetric comparison of IMRT and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).
Yoshimura T; Kinoshita R; Onodera S; Toramatsu C; Suzuki R; Ito YM; Takao S; Matsuura T; Matsuzaki Y; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Shimizu S
Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1095-102. PubMed ID: 27567089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
