These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17575069)

  • 1. Abuse behavior inventory: cutpoint, validity, and characterization of discrepancies.
    Zink T; Klesges LM; Levin L; Putnam F
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jul; 22(7):921-31. PubMed ID: 17575069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement about acts of aggression in marriage.
    O'Leary KD; Williams MC
    J Fam Psychol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):656-62. PubMed ID: 17176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality.
    Straus MA; Douglas EM
    Violence Vict; 2004 Oct; 19(5):507-20. PubMed ID: 15844722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing acceptance of violence toward women: a factor analysis of Burt's Acceptance of Interpersonal Violence Scale.
    Ogle RL; Noel NE; Maisto SA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Jul; 15(7):799-809. PubMed ID: 19448165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the physical violence component of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales when used in heterosexual couples: An item response theory analysis.
    Reichenheim ME; Klein R; Moraes CL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2007 Jan; 23(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17187104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A psychometric examination of English and Spanish versions of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales.
    Connelly CD; Newton RR; Aarons GA
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1560-79. PubMed ID: 16246917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factor structure and reliability of the revised conflict tactics scales' (CTS2) 10-factor model in a community-based female sample.
    Sung Hyun Yun
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Mar; 26(4):719-44. PubMed ID: 20442446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factor structure and validity of the revised conflict tactics scales for Spanish women.
    Calvete E; Corral S; Estévez A
    Violence Against Women; 2007 Oct; 13(10):1072-87. PubMed ID: 17898241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples.
    Moraes CL; Reichenheim ME
    Cad Saude Publica; 2002; 18(3):783-96. PubMed ID: 12048604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary report on the Accountability Scale: a change and outcome measure for intimate partner violence research.
    Costa DM; Canady B; Babcock JC
    Violence Vict; 2007; 22(5):515-31. PubMed ID: 18064967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting and testing the Appraisal of Violent Situation scales.
    Hawkins JW; Haggerty LA; Pearce CW; Kelly U; Grady K
    Health Care Women Int; 2009; 30(1-2):5-21. PubMed ID: 19116819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intimate partner violence and functional health status: associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors.
    Straus H; Cerulli C; McNutt LA; Rhodes KV; Conner KR; Kemball RS; Kaslow NJ; Houry D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 May; 18(5):625-31. PubMed ID: 19445614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its impact on women's mental health in rural western China: a study of a county in Ningxia].
    Gao YQ; Jacka T
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jun; 44(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 22692307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Men's sexual coercion in intimate relationships: development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships scale.
    Shackelford TK; Goetz AT
    Violence Vict; 2004 Oct; 19(5):541-56. PubMed ID: 15844724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between the abuse assessment screen and the revised conflict tactics scales for measuring physical violence during pregnancy.
    Reichenheim ME; Moraes CL
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Jun; 58(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 15143123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability and validity of empirically scaled measures of psychological/verbal control and physical/sexual abuse: relationship between current negative mood and a history of abuse independent of other negative life events.
    Pitzner JK; Drummond PD
    J Psychosom Res; 1997 Aug; 43(2):125-42. PubMed ID: 9278903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of three different scoring methods for self-report measures of psychological aggression in a sample of college females.
    Shorey RC; Brasfield H; Febres J; Cornelius TL; Stuart GL
    Violence Vict; 2012; 27(6):973-90. PubMed ID: 23393957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients.
    Iverson KM; King MW; Resick PA; Gerber MR; Kimerling R; Vogt D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Oct; 28(10):1288-93. PubMed ID: 23824907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do responses to an intimate partner violence screen predict scores on a comprehensive measure of intimate partner violence in low-income black women?
    Heron SL; Thompson MP; Jackson E; Kaslow NJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Oct; 42(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 14520319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the CADRI and CTS2 for Measuring Psychological and Physical Dating Violence Perpetration and Victimization.
    Cascardi M; Blank S; Dodani V
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Aug; 34(16):3466-3491. PubMed ID: 27760876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.