These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1757643)

  • 1. C. R. Henderson: contributions to predicting genetic merit.
    Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4052-66. PubMed ID: 1757643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. C. R. Henderson: contributions to the dairy industry.
    Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4045-51. PubMed ID: 1757642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. C. R. Henderson: the unfinished legacy.
    Kennedy BW
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4067-81. PubMed ID: 1757644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. C. R. Henderson, the statistician; and his contributions to variance components estimation.
    Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4035-44. PubMed ID: 1757641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. C. R. Henderson: farm boy, athlete, and scientist.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4082-96. PubMed ID: 1757645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire by dam subclass effects.
    Hoeschele I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):557-69. PubMed ID: 2045562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid inversion of additive by additive relationship matrices by including sire-dam combination effects.
    VanRaden PM; Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):570-9. PubMed ID: 2045563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 11325188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of nonadditive genetic variances for a total-merit model including maternal effects.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Aug; 71(8):2006-11. PubMed ID: 8376222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sewall Wright and quantitative genetics.
    Hill WG
    Genome; 1989; 31(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 2687090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method of computing restricted best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values for some animals in a population.
    Satoh M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2253-8. PubMed ID: 15318721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple and rapid inversion of additive relationship matrices incorporating parental uncertainty.
    Famula TR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1045-8. PubMed ID: 1582933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Producer breeding objectives and optimal sire selection.
    Tozer PR; Stokes JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3518-25. PubMed ID: 12512626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: II. Progeny traits in multiple contemporary groups within a herd.
    Lofgren DL; Harris DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3223-42. PubMed ID: 2613571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins.
    Varona L; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical note: An R package for fitting Bayesian regularized neural networks with applications in animal breeding.
    Pérez-Rodríguez P; Gianola D; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ; Crossa J
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3522-31. PubMed ID: 23658327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results.
    Varona L; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2186-91. PubMed ID: 10531605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of controlling instruments for improvements in cow sire selection.
    König S; Lessner S; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17369238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of number of sows and service time of boars on selection response and inbreeding using an animal model in a closed nucleus herd(1).
    Roehe R; Krieter J; Kalm E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 1993 Jan; 110(1-6):114-25. PubMed ID: 21395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.