These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1757791)

  • 1. Influence of age, gender, height and education on vibration sense. A study by tuning fork in 192 normal subjects.
    De Michele G; Filla A; Coppola N; Bisogno A; Trombetta L; Santorelli F; Campanella G
    J Neurol Sci; 1991 Oct; 105(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1757791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3-79 years.
    Hilz MJ; Axelrod FB; Hermann K; Haertl U; Duetsch M; Neundörfer B
    J Neurol Sci; 1998 Aug; 159(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 9741411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
    Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of age, temperature, sex, height and diazepam on vibration perception.
    Meh D; Denislic M
    J Neurol Sci; 1995 Dec; 134(1-2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8747856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group.
    Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of reference intervals for vibratory perception thresholds of the lower extremities in normal subjects.
    Inami K; Chiba K; Toyama Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2005 May; 10(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15928892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of aging on thermal and vibratory thresholds of quantitative sensory testing.
    Lin YH; Hsieh SC; Chao CC; Chang YC; Hsieh ST
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2005 Sep; 10(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 16221286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative data of quantitative thermal and vibratory thresholds in normal subjects in Taiwan: gender and age effect.
    Liou JT; Lui PW; Lo YL; Liou L; Wang SS; Yuan HB; Chan KH; Lee TY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1999 Jul; 62(7):431-7. PubMed ID: 10418177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
    Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
    Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
    Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effects of individual features on the measurement of vibration perception thresholds: standard setting for healthy people].
    Zamysłowska-Szmytke E; Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Szymczak W; Dudarewicz A
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 12577808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Body sway and vibration perception thresholds in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy.
    Bergin PS; Bronstein AM; Murray NM; Sancovic S; Zeppenfeld DK
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1995 Mar; 58(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 7897416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Measuring vibration sense in childhood. Normal values and initial experiences in polyneuropathies].
    Meister C; Molinari L; Thun-Hohenstein L; Boltshauser E
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1993 May; 141(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 8326962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vibration sensitivity thresholds: methodological considerations.
    Aaserud O; Juntunen J; Matikainen E
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1990 Oct; 82(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2270757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative vibration perception testing in elderly people: an assessment of variability.
    Thomson FJ; Masson EA; Boulton AJ
    Age Ageing; 1992 May; 21(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 1615777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
    Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M
    Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative vibration perception thresholds in normal and diabetic chinese: influence of age, height and body mass index.
    Hwu CM; Chang HY; Chen JY; Wang SL; Ho LT; Pan WH
    Neuroepidemiology; 2002; 21(6):271-8. PubMed ID: 12411729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perception of vibration. Normal findings and methodologic aspects].
    Claus D; Carvalho VP; Neundörfer B; Blaise JF
    Nervenarzt; 1988 Mar; 59(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 3374714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low efficacy using the 256-Hz tuning fork when evaluating the influence of somatosensation in balance control for relatively healthy elderly.
    Hafström A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 138(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 30113876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Rydel Seiffer tuning fork - Age and gender matter.
    Wolf K; Beume LA; Hohenhaus M; Harloff A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 221():107385. PubMed ID: 35926295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.