These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580089)

  • 1. Edge strength of resin-composite margins.
    Watts DC; Issa M; Ibrahim A; Wakiaga J; Al-Samadani K; Al-Azraqi M; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jan; 24(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 17580089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Edge-strength of flowable resin-composites.
    Baroudi K; Silikas N; Watts DC
    J Dent; 2008 Jan; 36(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 18068291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Edge strength of indirect restorative materials.
    Ereifej N; Silikas N; Watts DC
    J Dent; 2009 Oct; 37(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 19596506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro study of edge-strength of provisional polymer-based crown and fixed partial denture materials.
    Kim SH; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1570-3. PubMed ID: 17706276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between contraction stress and degree of conversion in restorative composites.
    Calheiros FC; Braga RR; Kawano Y; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):939-46. PubMed ID: 15501322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of light curing units on marginal adaptation and hardness of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Silikas N; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):38-45. PubMed ID: 17994153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin.
    Cekic-Nagas I; Ergun G; Nagas E; Tezvergil A; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Apr; 66(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 18446547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites.
    Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Watts D; Silikas N; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 16527343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. R-curve behavior and toughening mechanisms of resin-based dental composites: effects of hydration and post-cure heat treatment.
    Shah MB; Ferracane JL; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):760-70. PubMed ID: 19187956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
    Forberger N; Göhring TN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
    Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength and ultimate tensile strength of resin composite filled into dentine cavity; effect of bulk and incremental filling technique.
    Nayif MM; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 18276057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microhardness of resin composite materials light-cured through fiber reinforced composite.
    Fennis WM; Ray NJ; Creugers NH; Kreulen CM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):947-51. PubMed ID: 19261324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.