These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580457)

  • 1. A new clinical method for evaluating the closest speaking space in dentulous and edentulous subjects: a pilot study.
    Rizzatti A; Ceruti P; Mussano F; Erovigni F; Preti G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 17580457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anteroposterior and mediolateral variability of the closest speaking space.
    Rivera-Morales WC; Mohl ND
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 2133386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of denture fabrication and wear on closest speaking space and interocclusal distance during deglutition.
    de Souza RF; Marra J; Pero AC; Compagnoni MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 17618921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the closest speaking space in different dental and skeletal occlusions.
    Sakar O; Bural C; Sülün T; Öztaş E; Marşan G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 23566602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of the speech envelope and interocclusal dimensions in dentate subjects.
    Burnett CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 7748449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of new dentures on interocclusal distance during speech.
    Rodrigues Garcia RC; Oliveira VM; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 14651241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Record for measuring interocclusal distance in fixed implant prosthodontics.
    Williamson RT; Robinson FG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):666. PubMed ID: 11753324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interocclusal clearance during speech and in mandibular rest position. A comparison between different measuring methods.
    Meier B; Luck O; Harzer W
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Mar; 64(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 12649708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability of closest speaking space compared with interocclusal distance in dentulous subjects.
    Rivera-Morales WC; Mohl ND
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 2051356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absolute edentulous impressions.
    CAL; 1986 Mar; 49(9):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 3516331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study on the effect of different impression techniques on constancy of occlusal vertical dimension.
    Sabet EM; Abdalla F
    Egypt Dent J; 1978 Jan; 24(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 389602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interocclusal clearance and changes in occlusal position in dentate and edentulous jaws. 1].
    Ott RW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Nov; 46(11):762-5. PubMed ID: 1817882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cephalometric study comparing the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects in relation to the maxillomandibular space.
    D'Souza NL; Bhargava K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8667277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the stability of maxillaiy dentures: the use of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials for edentulous impressions.
    Massad J; Davis WJ; Lobel W; June R; Thornton J
    Dent Today; 2005 Feb; 24(2):118, 120-3; quiz 123, 140. PubMed ID: 15768945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.