These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580459)

  • 1. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
    Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
    Kugel G; Swift EJ; Sorensen JA; Tucker JH; Dunne JT
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions.
    Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application times for the single-step/double-mix technique for impression materials in clinical practice.
    Rupp F; Saker O; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Engel E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 22146256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.