These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580459)

  • 21. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Impressions in conservative dentistry].
    Charpentier J
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 16193849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients.
    Wöstmann B; Blösser T; Gouentenoudis M; Balkenhol M; Ferger P
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):611-8. PubMed ID: 16005801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DIAGNOdent measurements and correlation with the depth and volume of minimally invasive cavity preparations.
    Hamilton JC; Gregory WA; Valentine JB
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 16802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vivo study of a clinical surfactant used with poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):707-9. PubMed ID: 9180409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relating the marginal fit of the castings to the accuracy of the impressions made from laminated hydrocolloid impression technique: a comparative study.
    Sinha MR; Thakur B; Gaikwad A; Chaudhari LD; Kulkarni A; Kulkarni H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of polyvinyl siloxane for complete and partial denture impressions.
    Sami I; Eid HI; Alsayed SM
    Egypt Dent J; 1990 Apr; 36(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 2103905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wastage of a silicone impression material in a general practice setting: a comparison between hand and automixing methods.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Crisp RJ; Wilson MA
    SADJ; 2001 May; 56(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 11490695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.