These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580503)

  • 1. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Divine proportion in facial esthetics.
    Ricketts RM
    Clin Plast Surg; 1982 Oct; 9(4):401-22. PubMed ID: 7172592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faciometrics: a new syntax for facial feature analysis.
    El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA; Rasmy EM; Salah A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 9046629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harmonized profiloplasty using balanced angular profile analysis.
    Park HS; Rhee SC; Kang SR; Lee JH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 15156291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask.
    Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Divine proportions in the growing face.
    Ferring V; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18929263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentofacial deformities treated according to a dentoskeletal analysis based on the divine proportion: are the resulting faces de facto "divinely" proportioned?
    Scolozzi P; Momjian A; Courvoisier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):147-50. PubMed ID: 21187759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrence between the maxillary midline and bisector to the interpupillary line.
    Eskelsen E; Fernandes CB; Pelogia F; Cunha LG; Pallos D; Neisser MP; Liporoni PC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(1):37-41; discussion 42. PubMed ID: 19207457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A photographic system for the three-dimensional study of facial morphology.
    de Menezes M; Rosati R; Allievi C; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1070-7. PubMed ID: 19852596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.