These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17580724)

  • 1. NIDCD/VA hearing aid clinical trial and follow-up: coupler and real-ear measurement.
    Peek BF; Rosenfeld MA; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 17580724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
    Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid maximum output and loudness discomfort: are unaided loudness measures needed?
    Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 17849638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Ogiwara A; Nakagawa T; Inoue R; Umehara S; Hara Y; Suzuki K; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Feb; 48(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 32747167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and maximum power output in subjects recently fitted with NHS hearing aids.
    Munro KJ; Nind L; Cleaver VC
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Aug; 30(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 8879692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insertion gain measurements using two low-powered analogue hearing aids.
    Norman M; James P
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 11201324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.
    Kuk FK; Harper T; Doubek K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8180434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of hearing aid fitting according to the national acoustic laboratories' prescription for non-linear hearing aids and the desired sensation level methods in Japanese speakers: a crossover-controlled trial.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Nitta Y; Umehara S; Hara Y; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Oct; 50(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 36792399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.