117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17581164)
1. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs.
Gomes C; Magalhães M; Alves C; Amorim A; Pinto N; Gusmão L
Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 22940765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved criterion-referenced assessment in indirect tracking of haemophilia A using a 0.23 cM-resolution dense polymorphic marker set.
Machado FB; Duarte LP; Medina-Acosta E
Haemophilia; 2009 Sep; 15(5):1135-42. PubMed ID: 19624762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of X-linked short tandem repeat loci in routine parentage casework.
Silveira D; Silva FF; Jesus PR; Whittle MR
Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):1050-3. PubMed ID: 17524096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
Egeland T; Sheehan N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Formula Derivation and Validation of Probability of Exclusion in the Cases of Standard Triplet Parentage Testing].
Zhou M; Zhang HQ; Wang J
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 33(4):363-367. PubMed ID: 29219265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and forensic validation of a new multiplex PCR assay with 12 X-chromosomal short tandem repeats.
Turrina S; Atzei R; Filippini G; De Leo D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19083757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A general autosomal/X-linked model.
Hasstedt SJ; Skolnick M
Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 6100490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal typing and test sufficiency in parentage analyses.
Wenk RE; Houtz T; Chiafari FA
Transfusion; 2006 Feb; 46(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16441595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. X-chromosome data for 12 STRs: Towards an Argentinian database of forensic haplotype frequencies.
García MG; Catanesi CI; Penacino GA; Gusmão L; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():e8-e13. PubMed ID: 31085140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing exclusionary power of a paternity test involving a pair of alleged grandparents.
Scarpetta MA; Staub RW; Einum DD
Transfusion; 2007 Feb; 47(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 17302781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data.
Neff BD; Repka J; Gross MR
Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Jun; 59(4):315-31. PubMed ID: 11560451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Kinship determination using DNA markers].
Jorquera G H; Acuña P M; Cifuentes L L
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Feb; 136(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18483673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Population genetic evaluation of eight X-chromosomal short tandem repeat loci using Mentype Argus X-8 PCR amplification kit.
Becker D; Rodig H; Augustin C; Edelmann J; Götz F; Hering S; Szibor R; Brabetz W
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19083792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
