These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17581433)
1. Implementation of a severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups payment system in a large health plan: implications for pay for performance. Fay MD; Jackson DA; Vogel BB J Ambul Care Manage; 2007; 30(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 17581433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups. Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland. Atkinson G; Murray R J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine. Muldoon JH Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-payer severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups: a uniform method to severity-adjust discharge data. Leary RS; Johantgen ME; Farley D; Forthman MT; Wooster LD Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):60-71. PubMed ID: 10165388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA. Shen Y Med Care; 2003 Jun; 41(6 Suppl):II103-10. PubMed ID: 12773832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical appraisal of the DRG system. Problem areas for DRG reimbursement in the U.S.A. Harper DL Aust Health Rev; 1985; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10311188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of flat-rate payment in radiation oncology. German experience with disease-related groups for inpatient funding in radiation oncology]. Glocker S; Loskamp N; Bamberg M; Roeder N Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 16703284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of self-adapting G-DRG system 2004 to 2006 on in-patient services payment in pediatric hematology and oncology patients of a university hospital]. Christaras A; Schaper J; Strelow H; Laws HJ; Göbel U Klin Padiatr; 2006; 218(6):366-78. PubMed ID: 17080340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement. McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of DRG-based payment systems on quality of health care in OECD countries. Forgione DA; Vermeer TE; Surysekar K; Wrieden JA; Plante CA J Health Care Finance; 2004; 31(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 15816228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare's value-based payment initiatives: impact on and implications for improving physician documentation and coding. Rosenstein AH; O'Daniel M; White S; Taylor K Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 19461068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifying DRG-PPS to include only diagnoses present on admission: financial implications and challenges. Zhan C; Elixhauser A; Friedman B; Houchens R; Chiang YP Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 17496711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Introduction of the DRG system from the point of view of private health insurers]. Fritze J; Miebach J; Hüdig W Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Aug; 96(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 12244870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Return on investment in pay for performance: a diabetes case study. Curtin K; Beckman H; Pankow G; Milillo Y; Green RA J Healthc Manag; 2006; 51(6):365-74; discussion 375-6. PubMed ID: 17184001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital. Goldfield N Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 20042929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of misclassification errors on case mix measurement. Sutherland JM; Botz CK Health Policy; 2006 Dec; 79(2-3):195-202. PubMed ID: 16439035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician-level P4P--DOA? Can quality-based payment be resuscitated? McMahon LF; Hofer TP; Hayward RA Am J Manag Care; 2007 May; 13(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 17488186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]