653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17581459)
1. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption.
Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Feb; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17318044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption.
Maniar HS; Council ML; Prasad SM; Prasad SM; Chu C; Damiano RJ
J Surg Res; 2005 May; 125(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15836846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic surgery and resident training.
De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
Kenngott HG; Muller-Stich BP; Reiter MA; Rassweiler J; Gutt CN
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18609002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.
Heemskerk J; de Hoog DE; van Gemert WG; Baeten CG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1825-30. PubMed ID: 17690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model.
Passerotti CC; Passerotti AM; Dall'Oglio MF; Leite KR; Nunes RL; Srougi M; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 19476793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfer of training in robotic-assisted microvascular surgery.
Karamanoukian RL; Bui T; McConnell MP; Evans GR; Karamanoukian HL
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 17122554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks.
Nio D; Bemelman WA; Boer KT; Dunker MS; Gouma DJ; Gulik TM
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 11928018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the daVinci surgical system.
Hanly EJ; Marohn MR; Bachman SL; Talamini MA; Hacker SO; Howard RS; Schenkman NS
Am J Surg; 2004 Feb; 187(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 14769327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
Dakin GF; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
Ross JW; Preston MR
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term impact of a robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mini fellowship training program on postgraduate urological practice patterns.
Gamboa AJ; Santos RT; Sargent ER; Louie MK; Box GN; Sohn KH; Truong H; Lin R; Khosravi A; Santos R; Ornstein DK; Ahlering TE; Tyson DR; Clayman RV; McDougall EM
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):778-82. PubMed ID: 19091351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new era in laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures.
Khairy GA; Fouda M; Abdulkarim A; Al-Saigh A; Al-Kattan K
Saudi Med J; 2005 May; 26(5):777-80. PubMed ID: 15951869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Heemskerk J; van Dam R; van Gemert WG; Beets GL; Greve JW; Jacobs MJ; Bouvy ND
Dig Surg; 2005; 22(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 16479111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
