461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17581898)
1. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography.
Herzog C; Zwerner PL; Doll JR; Nielsen CD; Nguyen SA; Savino G; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17581898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose.
Baumüller S; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Seifert B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19587311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy?
Herzog C; Nguyen SA; Savino G; Zwerner PL; Doll J; Nielsen CD; Flohr TG; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 17495177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Wang J; Lu Y; Zhang ZL; Jiang SS; Zhou CS; Lu GM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):727-40. PubMed ID: 20707657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined.
Lau GT; Ridley LJ; Schieb MC; Brieger DB; Freedman SB; Wong LA; Lo SK; Kritharides L
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 15858083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.
Renker M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; O'Brien TX; Zwerner PL; Meyer M; Kerl JM; Bauer RW; Fink C; Vogl TJ; Henzler T
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 21693660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronary artery stenosis in high-risk patients: 64-section CT and coronary angiography--prospective study and analysis of discordance.
Gouya H; Varenne O; Trinquart L; Touzé E; Vignaux O; Spaulding C; Mas JL; Sablayrolles JL
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 19546426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease.
Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Gaemperli O; Schepis T; Valenta I; Koepfli P; Husmann L; Scheffel H; Leschka S; Eberli FR; Luscher TF; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):414-23. PubMed ID: 18552310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection--initial results.
Gerber BL; Coche E; Pasquet A; Ketelslegers E; Vancraeynest D; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 15550371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of high-pitch prospectively ECG-triggering CT coronary angiography for assessment of stenosis in 103 patients: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
Hu XH; Zheng WL; Wang D; Xie SS; Wu R; Zhang SZ
Clin Radiol; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1083-8. PubMed ID: 22613169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320-Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy.
Ko BS; Wong DT; Nørgaard BL; Leong DP; Cameron JD; Gaur S; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Kuribayashi S; Kimura T; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26444662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forty-slice spiral computed tomography of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy in a non-selected patient population.
Grosse C; Globits S; Hergan K
Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17325923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Yang L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Xu C; Zhao L; Yu W; Yan Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 19696294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT angiography for assessment.
Mittal TK; Panicker MG; Mitchell AG; Banner NR
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 23657888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Brodoefel H; Burgstahler C; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Schroeder S; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M; Kopp AF
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):346-55. PubMed ID: 18372455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical value of 16-slice multi-detector CT compared to invasive coronary angiography.
Aviram G; Finkelstein A; Herz I; Lessick J; Miller H; Graif M; Keren G
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16019611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]