These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT colonography: clinical evaluation of a method for automatic coregistration of polyps at follow-up surveillance studies. Helbren E; Roth HR; Hampshire TE; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor SA; Hawkes DJ; Halligan S Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 24991991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study. Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. Fletcher JG; Booya F; Summers RM; Roy D; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Fidler JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17646451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm. Pickhardt PJ; Pooler BD; Mbah I; Weiss JM; Kim DH Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):139-148. PubMed ID: 27552558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement. Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Yoshida H; Masutani Y; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 11818596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography. van Gelder RE; Florie J; Nio CY; Jensch S; de Jager SW; Vos FM; Venema HW; Bartelsman JF; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Laméris JS; Stoker J Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1181-92. PubMed ID: 17119975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Kim JY; Del Frate C; Magee C; Hahn PF Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15987967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Dachman AH; Kelly KB; Zintsmaster MP; Rana R; Khankari S; Novak JD; Ali AN; Qalbani A; Fletcher JG Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18796675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]