305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17582454)
1. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.
Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.
Duran M; Yurtsever D; Dunaev T
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study.
Smith A; Sterba-Boatwright B; Mott J
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4067-76. PubMed ID: 20566209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of the sources of Escherichia coli in a watershed using carbon-utilization patterns and composite data sets.
Moussa SH; Massengale RD
J Water Health; 2008 Jun; 6(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 18209282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.
Hagedorn C; Robinson SL; Filtz JR; Grubbs SM; Angier TA; Reneau RB
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 65(12):5522-31. PubMed ID: 10584013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees.
Price B; Venso E; Frana M; Greenberg J; Ware A
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3575-84. PubMed ID: 17599384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the source of fecal contamination in recreational waters.
Meyer KJ; Appletoft CM; Schwemm AK; Uzoigwe JC; Brown EJ
J Environ Health; 2005; 68(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16121484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of water quality parameters from diverse catchments during dry periods and following rain events.
Shah VG; Dunstan RH; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Rothkirch T
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3655-66. PubMed ID: 17428519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring source water for microbial contamination: evaluation of water quality measures.
Plummer JD; Long SC
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3716-28. PubMed ID: 17560623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Bacteroides measurements for reducing the statistical uncertainty associated with hydrologic flow and fecal loads in a mixed use watershed.
Gentry RW; Layton AC; McKay LD; McCarthy JF; Williams DE; Koirala SR; Sayler GS
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 17636294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delineation of a chemical and biological signature for stormwater pollution in an urban river.
Salmore AK; Hollis EJ; McLellan SL
J Water Health; 2006 Jun; 4(2):247-62. PubMed ID: 16813017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fecal source tracking by antibiotic resistance analysis on a watershed exhibiting low resistance.
Olivas Y; Faulkner BR
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Apr; 139(1-3):15-25. PubMed ID: 17562197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
