237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17582456)
1. Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach.
Lu J; Santo Domingo J; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3561-74. PubMed ID: 17582456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach.
Kildare BJ; Leutenegger CM; McSwain BS; Bambic DG; Rajal VB; Wuertz S
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3701-15. PubMed ID: 17644149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation and application of quantitative PCR assays using host-specific Bacteroidales genetic markers for swine fecal pollution tracking.
Fan L; Shuai J; Zeng R; Mo H; Wang S; Zhang X; He Y
Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 2):1569-1577. PubMed ID: 28967572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.
Ivanetich KM; Hsu PH; Wunderlich KM; Messenger E; Walkup WG; Scott TM; Lukasik J; Davis J
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Dec; 67(3):507-26. PubMed ID: 16973226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative identification of fecal water pollution sources by TaqMan real-time PCR assays using Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.
Lee DY; Weir SC; Lee H; Trevors JT
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 88(6):1373-83. PubMed ID: 20871990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Universal mitochondrial PCR combined with species-specific dot-blot assay as a source-tracking method of human, bovine, chicken, ovine, and porcine in fecal-contaminated surface water.
Kortbaoui R; Locas A; Imbeau M; Payment P; Villemur R
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2002-10. PubMed ID: 19249072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competitive metagenomic DNA hybridization identifies host-specific microbial genetic markers in cow fecal samples.
Shanks OC; Santo Domingo JW; Lamendella R; Kelty CA; Graham JE
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 72(6):4054-60. PubMed ID: 16751515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative analysis of human and cow-specific 16S rRNA gene markers for assessment of fecal pollution in river waters by real-time PCR.
Jeong JY; Park HD; Lee KH; Hwang JH; Ka JO
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 20208426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from poultry and free-living birds by (GTG)5-PCR genomic fingerprinting.
Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A
Int J Med Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 298(3-4):245-52. PubMed ID: 17572150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of genetic markers from the 16S rRNA gene V2 region for use in quantitative detection of selected Bacteroidales species and human fecal waste by qPCR.
Haugland RA; Varma M; Sivaganesan M; Kelty C; Peed L; Shanks OC
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 33(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 20655680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene.
Lamendella R; Domingo JW; Oerther DB; Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 59(3):651-60. PubMed ID: 17069624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.
Kobayashi A; Sano D; Hatori J; Ishii S; Okabe S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Aug; 97(16):7427-37. PubMed ID: 23053113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds.
Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Dec; 277(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 17986090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERIC-PCR fingerprinting-based community DNA hybridization to pinpoint genome-specific fragments as molecular markers to identify and track populations common to healthy human guts.
Wei G; Pan L; Du H; Chen J; Zhao L
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Oct; 59(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 15325756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of Enterococcus spp. from human and animal feces using 16S rRNA sequences, the esp gene, and PFGE for microbial source tracking in Korea.
Kim SY; Lee JE; Lee S; Lee HT; Hur HG; Ko G
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3423-8. PubMed ID: 20356091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specificity and sensitivity evaluation of novel and existing Bacteroidales and Bifidobacteria-specific PCR assays on feces and sewage samples and their application for microbial source tracking in Ireland.
Dorai-Raj S; O' Grady J; Colleran E
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4980-8. PubMed ID: 19783273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces.
Lu J; Santo Domingo JW; Hill S; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 75(18):5919-26. PubMed ID: 19633110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
