These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17583761)

  • 1. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water.
    Verliefde AR; Heijman SG; Cornelissen ER; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk JC
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3227-40. PubMed ID: 17583761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of natural organic matter on equilibrium adsorption of neutral and charged pharmaceuticals onto activated carbon.
    de Ridder DJ; Verliefde AR; Heijman SG; Verberk JQ; Rietveld LC; van der Aa LT; Amy GL; van Dijk JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 21278462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
    Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurotoxic and hepatotoxic cyanotoxins removal by nanofiltration.
    Teixeira MR; Rosa MJ
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2837-46. PubMed ID: 16839584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration.
    Zazouli MA; Susanto H; Nasseri S; Ulbricht M
    Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(13):3270-80. PubMed ID: 19520413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of conventional drinking-water-treatment processes in removal of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds.
    Stackelberg PE; Gibs J; Furlong ET; Meyer MT; Zaugg SD; Lippincott RL
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 May; 377(2-3):255-72. PubMed ID: 17363035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling.
    Her N; Amy G; Park HR; Song M
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1427-38. PubMed ID: 15016519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DBPs removal in GAC filter-adsorber.
    Kim J; Kang B
    Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17706265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adsorptive selenite removal from water using iron-coated GAC adsorbents.
    Zhang N; Lin LS; Gang D
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3809-16. PubMed ID: 18694584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Ventura F; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3601-10. PubMed ID: 18656225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can treated municipal wastewater be reused after ozonation and nanofiltration? Results from a pilot study of pharmaceutical removal in Henriksdal WWTP, Sweden.
    Flyborg L; Björlenius B; Persson KM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1113-20. PubMed ID: 20220232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of bromate and assimilable organic carbon from drinking water using granular activated carbon.
    Huang WJ; Peng HS; Peng MY; Chen LY
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(8):73-80. PubMed ID: 15566189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.
    Uyak V; Koyuncu I; Oktem I; Cakmakci M; Toroz I
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):789-94. PubMed ID: 17768007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of organic chlorinated compound removal from aqueous matrices by adsorption on activated carbon.
    Pavoni B; Drusian D; Giacometti A; Zanette M
    Water Res; 2006 Nov; 40(19):3571-9. PubMed ID: 16876226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of a three-component competitive adsorption model to evaluate and optimize granular activated carbon systems.
    Schideman LC; Snoeyink VL; Mariñas BJ; Ding L; Campos C
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3289-98. PubMed ID: 17572469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.