334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17584344)
1. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
Gethin G; Cowman S
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme.
Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 17584345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.
Günes UY
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):48-52. PubMed ID: 19471048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers.
Schubert V; Zander M
Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 9069740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary on Vermeulen H, Ubbink DT, Schreuder SM and Lubbers MJ (2007) Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme. Journal of Clinical Nursing16, 1270-1277 and Sugama J, Matsui Y, Sanada H, Konya C, Okuwa M and Kitagawa A (2007) A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable wound measurement system (VISITRAK). Journal of Clinical Nursing 16, 1265-1269.
O'Meara S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(12):1677-9. PubMed ID: 18482135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
Foltynski P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
Etris MB; Pribble J; LaBrecque J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 7546090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure ulcers. Assessment of healing.
Ferrell BA
Clin Geriatr Med; 1997 Aug; 13(3):575-86. PubMed ID: 9227946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the PUSH tool to measure venous ulcer healing.
Ratliff CR; Rodeheaver GT
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 May; 51(5):58-60, 62-3. PubMed ID: 16014985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
