These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17585432)

  • 21. Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2.
    Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Mora R; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 16769830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
    Asman P; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 110(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 1596230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
    Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent developments in visual field testing for glaucoma.
    Wu Z; Medeiros FA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 29(2):141-146. PubMed ID: 29256895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects.
    Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Gupta N; Bathija R; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1998 Sep; 116(9):1153-8. PubMed ID: 9747672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation between static automated and scanning laser entoptic perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Plummer DJ; Lopez A; Azen SP; LaBree L; Bartsch DU; Sadun AA; Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1693-701. PubMed ID: 10964832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychophysical measurement of glaucomatous damage.
    Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2001 May; 45 Suppl 3():S313-8; discussion S322-4. PubMed ID: 11377455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Aoki Y; Takahashi G; Kitahara K
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.
    Johnson CA; Brandt JD; Khong AM; Adams AJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 7826296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Glaucoma detection with damato multifixation campimetry online.
    Olsen AS; Alberti M; Serup L; la Cour M; Damato B; Kolko M
    Eye (Lond); 2016 May; 30(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 26987590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Priority of test locations for automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Zeyen TG; Zulauf M; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Apr; 100(4):518-22; discussion 523. PubMed ID: 8479710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.
    Brusini P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 11192559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.
    Shah NN; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Hoffmann EM; Zangwill LM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1593-602. PubMed ID: 16949444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.