These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17586147)

  • 1. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry.
    Rubel BS
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):629-42, vi. PubMed ID: 17586147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impression materials: basic properties.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(5):510-2, 514, 516. PubMed ID: 11199630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental impression materials.
    Perry R
    J Vet Dent; 2013; 30(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 24006720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials.
    Jagger DC; Al Jabra O; Harrison A; Vowles RW; McNally L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Dec; 12(4):154-60. PubMed ID: 15691188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials.
    Demajo JK; Cassar V; Farrugia C; Millan-Sango D; Sammut C; Valdramidis V; Camilleri J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26757331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impression materials--are there any really new ones?
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 20236915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified indexing technique for the immediate interim restoration of a dental implant.
    Reis JM; Abi-Rached Fde O; Scardueli CR; Pinelli LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 24433838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate impression material and technique for well-adapted restorations.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2007 Feb; 26(2):120, 122-3. PubMed ID: 17348280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use.
    Mandikos MN
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Dec; 43(6):428-34. PubMed ID: 9973714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.