These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17586853)

  • 1. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks.
    Connor SE; Arscott T; Berry J; Greene L; O'Gorman R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 17586853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
    Olszewski R; Tanesy O; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 38(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 19574058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
    Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-source CT angiography in aortic stent grafting: An in vitro aorta phantom study of image noise and radiation dose.
    Sun Z; Ng C
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):884-93. PubMed ID: 20447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 10895633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
    Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning.
    Loubele M; Jacobs R; Maes F; Schutyser F; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Coudyzer W; Vandermeulen D; van Cleynenbreugel J; Marchal G; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):211-6. PubMed ID: 16461498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar cephalograms.
    Wu MC; Cheng KS; Chen YT; Liu JK; Ting WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 20660132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.
    Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
    Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.
    Liljeholm R; Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Hellén-Halme K; Shi XQ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28944361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Low-dosage dental CT].
    Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.