BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17587137)

  • 1. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.
    Drennan WR; Anderson ES; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e92-8. PubMed ID: 24552679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Kang RS; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.
    Won JH; Clinard CG; Kwon S; Dasika VK; Nie K; Drennan WR; Tremblay KL; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 12(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 21271274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Anderson ES; Nelson DA; Kreft H; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):364-75. PubMed ID: 21786905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Mandarin Chinese Speech Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants Using the Spectral Ripple Discrimination Test.
    Dai C; Zhao Z; Shen W; Zhang D; Lei G; Qiao Y; Yang S
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3557-3563. PubMed ID: 29806954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
    Poissant SF; Bero EM; Busekroos L; Shao W
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
    Golub JS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Worman TD; Rubinstein JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hong RS; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):360-74. PubMed ID: 16875232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Jung KH; Won JH; Drennan WR; Jameyson E; Miyasaki G; Norton SJ; Rubinstein JT
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 22398954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.