These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17587137)

  • 21. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
    Jeon EK; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Henry BA; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.
    Anderson ES; Oxenham AJ; Nelson PB; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3925-34. PubMed ID: 23231122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Won JH; Moon IJ; Jin S; Park H; Woo J; Cho YS; Chung WH; Hong SH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140920. PubMed ID: 26485715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
    Bhattacharya A; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectrotemporal Modulation Discrimination in Infants With Normal Hearing.
    Noble AR; Resnick J; Broncheau M; Klotz S; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA; Horn DL
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 36218270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Ren C; Yang J; Zha D; Lin Y; Liu H; Kong Y; Liu S; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():124-130. PubMed ID: 30173970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Arora K; Dawson PW
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Dec; 9(6):065007. PubMed ID: 23187159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?
    Zhou N; Dixon S; Zhu Z; Dong L; Weiner M
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948385. PubMed ID: 32895024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients.
    Fetterman BL; Domico EH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Mar; 126(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 11956533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of spatial separation and noise type on sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Jiang Y; GalvinIII JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan YS; Chen B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 137(8):829-836. PubMed ID: 28296522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.
    Oba SI; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21389857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining the Relationship Between Speech Recognition and a Spectral-Temporal Test With a Mixed Group of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aronoff JM; Duitsman L; Matusik DK; Hussain S; Lippmann E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 33719538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.