These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17587299)

  • 1. Physicomechanical evaluation of low-shrinkage dental nanocomposites based on silsesquioxane cores.
    Soh MS; Yap AU; Sellinger A
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Jun; 115(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 17587299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of novel dental nanocomposites reinforced with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS).
    Wu X; Sun Y; Xie W; Liu Y; Song X
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 20171728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of chain modifications on the physicomechanical properties of silsesquioxane-based dental nanocomposites.
    Soh MS; Yap AU; Sellinger A
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Apr; 85(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17696152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of curing times and light curing methods on the polymerization shrinkage stress of a shrinkage-optimized composite with hybrid-type prepolymer fillers.
    Visvanathan A; Ilie N; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):777-84. PubMed ID: 16914193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Soh MS
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 15088730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate.
    Fong H; Dickens SH; Flaim GM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 15904694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organosilicon dental composite restoratives based on 1,3-bis[(p-acryloxymethyl) phenethyl] tetramethyldisiloxane.
    Lai JH; Johnson AE; Douglas RB
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):570-8. PubMed ID: 15134945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 19286247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer.
    Eick JD; Kotha SP; Chappelow CC; Kilway KV; Giese GJ; Glaros AG; Pinzino CS
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):1011-7. PubMed ID: 17097138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system.
    Lien W; Vandewalle KS
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 20053434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites.
    Stansbury JW; Trujillo-Lemon M; Lu H; Ding X; Lin Y; Ge J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 15681003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Siloranes in dental composites.
    Weinmann W; Thalacker C; Guggenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15681004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer.
    Atai M; Nekoomanesh M; Hashemi SA; Amani S
    Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):663-8. PubMed ID: 15236941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems.
    Atai M; Watts DC; Atai Z
    Biomaterials; 2005 Aug; 26(24):5015-20. PubMed ID: 15769537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types.
    Leprince J; Palin WM; Mullier T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):364-76. PubMed ID: 20202096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of aging on mechanical properties of composite restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation approach.
    Yap AU; Chung SM; Rong Y; Tsai KT
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 15470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials.
    Stavridakis MM; Dietschi D; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 15765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time dependence of composite shrinkage using halogen and LED light curing.
    Uhl A; Mills RW; Rzanny AE; Jandt KD
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 15705435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.