129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17587630)
1. [Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature].
Douay N; Belot F; Bader G; Guyot B; Heitz D; Fauconnier A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007; 35(7-8):632-6. PubMed ID: 17587630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Lakeman M; Kruitwagen RF; Vos MC; Roovers JP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 18619923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Lakeman MM; The S; Schellart RP; Dietz V; ter Haar JF; Thurkow A; Scholten PC; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1473-82. PubMed ID: 22925365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.
Silva-Filho AL; Rodrigues AM; Vale de Castro Monteiro M; da Rosa DG; Pereira e Silva YM; Werneck RA; Bavoso N; Triginelli SA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 19380188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: Comparison of conventional suture ligature versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing.
Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Sanz F; Rubod C; Collinet P; Cosson M
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 46(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 28934083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Use of plasmakinetics vessel sealing vs suture material in abdominal total hysterectomy].
Briones Landa CH; Zepeda Zaragoza J; Dupré Aramburu G; Cruz Islas ML
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2009 Dec; 77(12):556-61. PubMed ID: 20077879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial.
Elhao M; Abdallah K; Serag I; El-Laithy M; Agur W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bipolar coagulation with the BiClamp forceps versus conventional suture ligation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in 175 vaginal hysterectomy patients.
Zubke W; Hornung R; Wässerer S; Hucke J; Füllers U; Werner C; Schmitz P; Lobodasch K; Hammermüller U; Wojdat R; Volz J; De Wilde RL; Wallwiener D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 280(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 19252920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases].
Dubuisson J; Golfier F; Massoud M; Benchaib M; Bryssine B; Raudrant D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 18068907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Wetherilt LS; Kiyak H; Yilmaz S; Kaya E
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(10):523-529. PubMed ID: 29192412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised controlled trial of LigaSure versus conventional suture ligature for abdominal hysterectomy.
Hagen B; Eriksson N; Sundset M
BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):968-70. PubMed ID: 15958001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal hysterectomy and multimodal anaesthesia with bipolar vessel sailing (Biclamp(®) forceps) versus conventional suture technique: quality results' analysis.
Leo L; Riboni F; Gambaro C; Surico D; Surico N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):1025-9. PubMed ID: 21984039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive vaginal hysterectomy using bipolar vessel sealing: preliminary experience with 500 cases.
Ghirardini G; Mohamed M; Bartolamasi A; Malmusi S; Dalla Vecchia E; Algeri I; Zanni A; Renzi A; Cavicchioni O; Braconi A; Pazzoni F; Alboni C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jan; 33(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 23259887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in the large uterus with the LigaSure bipolar diathermy system.
Mistrangelo E; Febo G; Ferrero B; Ferrero S; Deltetto F; Camanni M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 199(5):475.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for abdominal hysterectomy with uterine myomas more than 14 weeks in size: a randomized controlled trial.
Aydin C; Yildiz A; Kasap B; Yetimalar H; Kucuk I; Soylu F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 22517057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thyroid surgery: use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System versus conventional knot tying.
Youssef T; Mahdy T; Farid M; Latif AA
Int J Surg; 2008 Aug; 6(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 18585113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Lakeman MM; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):777. PubMed ID: 23565958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Soreefan AH; Beebeejaun MS
BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):776-7. PubMed ID: 23565956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy.
Zhu L; Lang JH; Liu CY; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Fan R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 19302739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia on morphine requirement after abdominal hysterectomy.
Massicotte L; Chalaoui KD; Beaulieu D; Roy JD; Bissonnette F
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 May; 53(5):641-7. PubMed ID: 19419359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
