These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1758766)

  • 1. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access.
    Whalen DH
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 1758766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features.
    Marslen-Wilson W; Warren P
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Oct; 101(4):653-75. PubMed ID: 7984710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective acoustic phonetic impairment and lexical access in an aphasic patient.
    Caplan D; Utman JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):512-7. PubMed ID: 8120262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rhyme decisions to spoken words and nonwords.
    McQueen JM
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Mar; 21(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 8469130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory.
    Frauenfelder UH; Segui J; Dijkstra T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 2137525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexically guided retuning of visual phonetic categories.
    van der Zande P; Jesse A; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):562-71. PubMed ID: 23862831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.
    Ganong WF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 6444985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: the role of acoustic structure.
    Burton MW; Baum SR; Blumstein SE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):567-75. PubMed ID: 2527963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.
    Andruski JE; Blumstein SE; Burton M
    Cognition; 1994 Sep; 52(3):163-87. PubMed ID: 7956004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition.
    Pitt MA; Samuel AG
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Oct; 29(2):149-88. PubMed ID: 7587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects.
    Sumner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 23862902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory phonetic priming: Where does the effect come from?
    Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):180-96. PubMed ID: 26041020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context and lexical access: implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Burgess C; Tanenhaus MK; Seidenberg MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):620-32. PubMed ID: 2526855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of auditory prestimulation on naming in aphasia.
    Podraza BL; Darley FL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):669-83. PubMed ID: 604681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch.
    van Alphen PM; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.
    Fox RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Aug; 10(4):526-40. PubMed ID: 6235317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status.
    Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):268-286. PubMed ID: 8473839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.