125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1758767)
1. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size.
Predebon J
Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative distance judgments of familiar and unfamiliar objects viewed under representatively natural conditions.
Predebon J
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2345687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of familiar size on judgments of relative size and distance.
Predebon J
Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1211-4. PubMed ID: 492892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived size of familiar objects and the theory of off-sized perceptions.
Predebon J
Percept Psychophys; 1994 Aug; 56(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 7971124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of instructions and familiar size in absolute judgments of size and distance.
Predebon J
Percept Psychophys; 1992 Apr; 51(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 1603648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception.
Predebon J
Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception.
Kelly JW; Hammel W; Sjolund LA; Siegel ZD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 26105656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of familiar size in spatial judgments under natural viewing conditions.
Predebon J
Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Feb; 48(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 450614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances.
Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE
Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-dimensional and multi-dimensional studies of the exocentric distance estimates in frontoparallel plane, virtual space, and outdoor open field.
Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Ribeiro-Filho NP; Da Silva JA
Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 17120706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.
Li Z; Phillips J; Durgin FH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2205-17. PubMed ID: 21735313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.
Lacey S; Campbell C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 16618639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The visual perception of exocentric distance in outdoor settings.
Norman JF; Adkins OC; Pedersen LE; Reyes CM; Wulff RA; Tungate A
Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():100-4. PubMed ID: 26475085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection.
Cooper LA; Schacter DL; Ballesteros S; Moore C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 1532021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.
Li Z; Sun E; Strawser CJ; Spiegel A; Klein B; Durgin FH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):477-93. PubMed ID: 22889186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The effects of familiar-size cue on children's judgments of size and distance].
Higashiyama A
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 7169706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Convergence responses to monocularly viewed objects: implications for distance perception.
Predebon J
Perception; 1994; 23(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 7971108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.
Frisby JP; Buckley D; Duke PA
Perception; 1996; 25(2):129-54. PubMed ID: 8733143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
