These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17588228)

  • 1. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crystal packing effects on protein loops.
    Rapp CS; Pollack RM
    Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 15852307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank.
    Nederveen AJ; Doreleijers JF; Vranken W; Miller Z; Spronk CA; Nabuurs SB; Güntert P; Livny M; Markley JL; Nilges M; Ulrich EL; Kaptein R; Bonvin AM
    Proteins; 2005 Jun; 59(4):662-72. PubMed ID: 15822098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification.
    Wojcik J; Mornon JP; Chomilier J
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(5):1469-90. PubMed ID: 10373380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Kihara D; Huang YJ; Zheng D; Montelione GT; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):290-306. PubMed ID: 14517980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.
    Lee SY; Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 16456861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints.
    Skolnick J; Kolinski A; Ortiz AR
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Jan; 265(2):217-41. PubMed ID: 9020984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of the conformation and geometry of loops in globular proteins: testing ArchDB, a structural classification of loops.
    Fernandez-Fuentes N; Querol E; Aviles FX; Sternberg MJ; Oliva B
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):746-57. PubMed ID: 16021623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Clore GM; Robien MA; Gronenborn AM
    J Mol Biol; 1993 May; 231(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 8496968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution prediction of protein helix positions and orientations.
    Li X; Jacobson MP; Friesner RA
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):368-82. PubMed ID: 15048828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking of TASSER in the ab initio limit.
    Borreguero JM; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
    Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies.
    Inbar Y; Benyamini H; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
    Phys Biol; 2005 Nov; 2(4):S156-65. PubMed ID: 16280621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of residual dipolar couplings as restraints in ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Haliloglu T; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biopolymers; 2003 Dec; 70(4):548-62. PubMed ID: 14648765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational modeling of protein mutant stability: analysis and optimization of statistical potentials and structural features reveal insights into prediction model development.
    Parthiban V; Gromiha MM; Abhinandan M; Schomburg D
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():54. PubMed ID: 17705837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.